Join the Media Squatters discussion group


May 14, 2014
Company Day and Annual Meeting
Axcel Company
Copenhagen, Denmark

May 29, 2014
Making Information Pay
Book Expo America
Javits Center, NYC

June 13, 2014
Generation Like: Competing for the Millennial Market
NY State Broadcasters Association
Waldorf Astoria, NYC, 915am

November 17, 2014
le club b
Hamburg, Germany



CNN: A New Role for the One Percent

(CNN) -- A whole lot of us are stuck with credit-card debt that goes up each month, mortgages worth more than our homes and student loans that extend into infinity. So it's only natural that we look at the debt crisis from the bottom up: from the perspective of the 99% who are getting screwed.

But what if we instead looked at this whole mess from the top down, from the point of view of the 1%: the billionaires and venture capitalists in Mitt Romney's world? Maybe, just maybe, their problem is our problem.

In fact, as I have come to see it, short of civilization-ending revolution, solving the debt crisis might actually mean saving the 1%.

They have the power and the money, they own our government, and they won't go down without taking everyone and everything else with them. Instead of backing them even further into the corner of fear and defensiveness, we need to help them find a way out. And that means helping them understand how they got there.

The debt crisis is not entirely President Bush's or President Obama's fault. It's not even Congress' fault. It actually resulted from a short-term "fix" to the economy made about 700 years ago.

See, for pretty much the entire first millennium -- what we call the Middle Ages -- the 00.01%, the feudal lords, enjoyed total control over the land and its people. The 99.99% worked the land and served the lords, who created no value at all. But by around 1100, the Crusades moved a whole lot of people and stuff around Europe. Peasants were exposed to sugar, cotton and all sorts of new weaving and milling technologies for the first time. Former peasant farmers started to get smarter and more productive. They established market days and traded what they grew and made with one another. They invented local currencies to store and exchange value instead of bartering.

Local currency then worked very differently from the money we use today. Someone would simply bring grain they harvested to the grain store, and come out with a foil receipt. The receipt could be broken into smaller pieces, which served as money. Since some grain was lost to spoilage, the currency's value went down over time. This meant it had to be spent instead of saved. So the money circulated very rapidly.

People got wealthy, invested in upkeep on their windmills, paid one another good wages, and got taller. Little towns got so rich that they built cathedrals. That's how a peer-to-peer economy works.

But the aristocrats weren't participating in any of this wealth. Without a dependent peasant class, they had no way to survive. They didn't know how to do anything themselves. They needed a way to make money simply by having money. So they came up with some ways to force new kinds of dependence.

Their first trick was to outlaw local currency. If people wanted to trade among themselves, they would have to borrow money from the central treasury, with interest. Wars were fought, blood was spilled, but they got their way. We have all but forgotten that the money we use today is a monopoly currency that costs us more than it's worth.

The second great idea was the chartered monopoly: the corporation. It gave just one firm -- one friend of the king -- the authority to do business in a certain industry. The British East India Trading Company, for example, had all rights to cotton in America. A farmer wasn't permitted to sell his cotton to neighbors, or to make it into anything. He had to sell it at fixed prices to the company, which shipped it to England and let some other chartered corporation make mittens and hats, which were then shipped back to America for sale.

That's why we fought the Revolution.

The problem with this scheme is that it works by stifling innovation and competition. The wealthy stay wealthy by extracting value instead of creating it. The more value they extract, the more laws they write protecting the rights and privileges of the extractors. As companies like General Electric realized, it was better to sell off productive assets and become more like a bank. The system was created for people who have money to make money. The value creators are the chumps.

The most surprising victims in this whole saga, however, are the corporations themselves. You think you're scared? Talk to the heads of America's corporations. They have sucked all the money out of the system, and don't know how to create any more. According to Deloitte, asset profitability for American firms has steadily fallen 75% over the last 40 years. In other words, corporations have managed to absorb all the money, but they don't know how to do anything with it. They have no skills, no competencies and no vision.

It's not the 99% who need to retrain themselves in order to get jobs. It's the 1% who need to face the fact that their 600-year workaround of the value creation has reached the very endpoint of diminishing returns. They need to consider whether they might actually make more money at this stage of the game by helping people create value instead of actively preventing it.

What would that look like? Right now, companies like Google, eBay, Square, Kickstarter and even PayPal and Apple are at least pointed in the right direction. They create and sell tools and services that give people and small businesses the ability to create and exchange value with one another again. They understand that real value creation comes by fostering the peer-to-peer transactions of a bottom-up marketplace rather than simply repressing such activity.

But we, the 99%, are the only ones who can show them the way. We need to begin by abandoning the fruitless quest for gainful corporate employment, and instead start working for ourselves and one another. We must stop outsourcing our savings and investments to bankrupt corporations, and instead invest in the people and businesses in our own communities -- however we define those.

In doing so, we will very quickly create demand for the kinds of networks, supply chains and services that only larger companies can provide. We will give the 1% an opportunity to re-educate themselves, to find a path to success, and -- for the first time in centuries -- to experience the guilt-free satisfaction of working for a living.


References (16)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Doug Rushkoff believes central currencies, and big corporations, were invented to repress peer-to-peer production. And their time is now up.It's not the 99% who need to retrain themselves in order to get jobs. It's the 1% who need to face...
  • Response
    Response: Check This Out
    Wonderful Site, Keep up the fantastic job. thnx!
  • Response
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    The best shampoo for oily hair with dandruff is those that hold resorcin, salicylic corrosive, ketoconazole, selenium, zinc, and coal tar. The shampoo must be kneaded in the head to dispose of the chips and oil; subsequently a careful wash ought to be carried out to guarantee that it is washed ...
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Response: dumpsters
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Response: Darian Braun
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent
  • Response
    Douglas Rushkoff - Blog - CNN: A New Role for the One Percent

Reader Comments (8)

"Money is like manure. If you spread it around it does a lot of good. But if you pile it up in one place it stinks like hell."

Local currencies have been pretty successful in supporting local economies: you can't deposit the specie in your bank account, you have to go spend it at a local merchant. The idea of a sort of online currency - one that can only be re-spent, not saved or invested - seems like it has the potential to do the same on a larger scale. And with the increasing spread of smartphones, it's much more feasible to completely eliminate paper money for face-to-face transactions.

As one of the commenters on CNN (one of the few that seems to have actually read the piece rather than projecting culture-war talking points onto it) noted, pushing these transactions onto systems like PayPal would support the 1% and the current system. Bt if the idea grew, open-source startups would inevitably emerge.

Let a million P2P transactions bloom! You have nothing to lose but your credit-card debt!

March 9, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Daniel Ash

Only stupid people will believe this logic. Unfortunately that means 90% of the of 99%. How did Reganomics work? Great success right? This video brought to you by Time Warner.

March 11, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJack SwaIllow

Once again communism rares it's head in disguise as "just for the common man". The feudal Lords of old provided protection from the raiders and theives. They weren't all bad guys. The people needed leaders and someone to give them direction and something to hold them together as a unit. Was it abused? Yes! Some people will always abuse authority and some will use it properly, but all in all it was necessary for the establishment of a society. This guy and his followers, (to me and I may just be an old parnoid), are espousing what was foretold in the Bible. How would we access our monies? We wouldn't need cash, all of our money would be controlled by a universal bank, wouldn't need credit cards. We could each have a tattoo that would have all of our information available by scanning a computer. Revelations 13:16-17 SCARY.

March 12, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJohn McClure

Wow, I've seen some pretty crazy things on internet comment threads but I think that this is the first time that I've ever seen someone defend feudal lords. Don't really have much else to say about that, just kind of dumbstruck by it.

March 13, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterDrax Sleeta

Not so sure why Doug thinks that revolution would be "civilization ending" and that somehow they could drag the rest of us down with them...In terms of the 1% of the 1% you're only talking about a few hundred people, maybe a thousand or a couple thousand if you want to broaden it a little bit, not that many "high-value targets" (pun intended) to take out in the grand scheme of things. One of my siblings is a bodyguard for the 1% and let me tell you, security is almost always an illusion, their security especially so, and you can do some pretty nifty things with modern firearms and explosives

March 13, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterDrax Sleeta

@Drax it again or read it again. This was a brilliant take down of the 1% and a really good subversive notion that would actually work better than your high value targets with explosives idea. The 1% are where they are because they can buy armies, pass laws, and own prisons. Indeed let them relearn how to work for a living.

April 19, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterCinna

I've found only one group that makes sense in all this madness. That's OsiXs. Everyone else just sounds crazy. You know, like they don't know what the hell their talking about. Yes, Douglas like many others can rattle off the problems. And this is good. The problem is, people are sick of hearing about the problems. We are living them. People want to know what to do about the problems. Protesting is good for venting but it's not a solution.

Read “Common Sense 3.1” at ( )

We don’t have to live like this anymore. "Spread the News"

April 29, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMad Max

Most confusing article ever read. Dead to the old billionaires and hail to the new billionairs but please do not understand banking and the root of it all? I mean CNN does say it all and the aplauses given too. YOU keep being sended in circles, dont YOU understand this?

March 25, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterHorst G Ludwig

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.


Book Business Katinka Matson
The Brockman Agency
Media Inquiries media[at]rushkoff[dot]com
Talks talks[at]rushkoff[dot]com
Personal rushkoff[at]
All Else contact[at]rushkoff[dot]com



Follow @rushkoff on Twitter.




Design by AMY E. MARTIN