RushkoffMail

Name:
Email:

MediaSquat

Join the Media Squatters discussion group

February 24, 2015
Lecture at Staten Island College
Staten Island, New York, NY, 4:30p

April 6, 2015
Digital Media Environment
Middle Tennessee University
Murfreesboro, Tennessee, 7pm

April 11, 2015
New Jersey Communications Association Convention Keynote
St. Peters University
Jersey City, New Jersey

May 12, 2015
Transforming Media: New Realities of a Digital Age
University of Denver
Denver, CO

March 10, 2015
Think Outside the Boss: Cooperative Alternatives to the Sharing Economy
With Trebor Sholz, Sarah Horowitz and others
Civic Hall

New York, NY

 

Sunday
Sep042005

Commodified vs. Commoditized

Strangely enough, this little usage dilemma hasn't been written about in any reference book or website I can find. And my copyeditors at HarperCollins want me to use the word "commodified" exclusively, since it's the only one in Websters. But I see the words as very different, and have issued a big STET on that one.

And so I am hereby declaring the proper way for these two words to be used, based on the way I've been hearing them, as well as seeing them used in magazines and books:

"Commodification" is a somewhat Marxist idea, referring to the way that market values can replace other social values, or the way a market can replace a communal system. "Our parties become commodified as Tupperware moves in to turn them into buying opportunities." or "The techniques for proper breast feeding used to be passed down from mother to daughter, but now there is a market for lactation consultants. As a result, one of the most intimate human functions has become commodified."

"Commoditization" is a newer and undocumented word (except in WIKI) referring specifically to the way that goods that used to be distinguishable in terms of attributes end up becoming mere commodities in the eyes of the market or consumers. "The collapse of Marlboro's brand value in the early 1990's convinced cigarette manufacturers that their products had become commoditized." or "Unless Intel comes up with a new kind of computer memory chip, Japanese equivalents will commoditize RAM." The problem with commoditization is that the only thing that left to distinguish one brand from another is price, so margins shrink.

Commodification is more of a crime of the market against humanity, while commoditization is more of a market problem for the manufacturers of branded goods.

Agreed?

Reader Comments (5)

Thank you! I have been trying to figure out this little dilemma for some time now, in relation to my research on subcultural movements and the internet :)

November 9, 2008 | Unregistered Commentertunabananas

Helpful, although for some reason I gravitated toward using "commoditized" in the Marxist sense you describe above because I was talking more at the level of society doing something, versus an individual or small group. Don't know if this has any linguistic value, but I imagine a single company turning a historic process or service into a commodity as "commodifying," whereas "the market "commoditized" home ownership by turning mortgages into securities. Just my brain?

December 30, 2008 | Unregistered Commentercommunitylife

Hello
I've been struggling with this and found these references:

Rethinking commodification By Martha M. Ertman, Joan C. Williams, 2005 (it's available via Google books), in the Afterword by Carol Rose on page 403. She considers commodification and commoditization analogous, referencing Arjun Appadurai's The Social Life of Things - Commodities in cultural Perspective, 1986.

May 4, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLizzy Tawdry

Some consumers are better than others at judging the quality of a product. For those people, commoditization has not occurred, so long as they still have a range to choose from.

August 30, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterTod

Thank you for clarifying. You will be pleased to know that I too have been using those words in the manner you suggest. The difference is crucial when discussing historical socio-economic inequality, as both meanings are relevant.

March 3, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterEssayist
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.

Contact

Book Business Katinka Matson
The Brockman Agency
212-935-8900
Media Inquiries media[at]rushkoff[dot]com
Talks talks[at]rushkoff[dot]com
Personal rushkoff[at]rushkoff.com
All Else contact[at]rushkoff[dot]com
 

Twitter

@rushkoff

Follow @rushkoff on Twitter.

 

Elsewhere

   

Design by AMY E. MARTIN